Aligning the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) counterfactual approach with the practice of retroduction: some preliminary insights

Federico Iannacci*, Colm Fearon, Peter Kawalek, Boyka Simeonova

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

165 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study offers fresh ontological insights by examining generative causality through the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) counterfactual lens, in conjunction with Critical Realism and the practice of retroduction. Specifically, it claims that Information Systems (IS) researchers could retroduce generative mechanisms by leveraging the QCA counterfactual approach to causation because retroduction is about conjecturing hypothetical mechanisms that would generate the outcome of interest in a counterfactual fashion. Drawing on an example of typological theorising, this study calls for a renewed effort in the use of retroduction in the study of IS phenomena. In addition, this study sheds new light on the overarching approach for conducting Critical Realist (case study) research. A number of theoretical, methodological, and practical implications are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInformation Systems Journal
Early online date18 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis
  • counterfactual approach
  • generative causality
  • mechanism
  • retroduction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aligning the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) counterfactual approach with the practice of retroduction: some preliminary insights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this