Abstract
Ambush marketing, sometimes also known as guerrilla marketing, comprises attempts to create an unauthorised association with mega-sporting events (such as the Olympic Games and the FIFA World Cup) without obtaining official sponsorship agreements. This article contends that the contemporary law of sports sponsorships against ambush marketing harbours a palpable but much-neglected sumptuary impulse, which has never before been adequately scrutinised. It shows that pre-modern sumptuary law strangely resonates with modern anti-ambush law’s sumptuary obsession with the visual order of symbols and images as prestige signifiers. It also reveals an ongoing ‘intellectual property’ turn in the recent development of sumptuary anti-ambush law-making, whose ambition is to reify sports-derived sumptuary distinction into a thing-in-itself for nearly absolute ‘property’ protection. My argument is illustrated by a carefully selected number of ambush disputes including Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) v Telstra, which represents the latest development in this field of law.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 62–86 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 Feb 2020 |
Keywords
- Barton Beebe
- Olympic Games
- Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter
- ambush marketing
- dress code
- sports sponsorship IP law
- sumptuary code
- trade marks and brands