Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Addressing Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs): a Critical Interrogation of Legislative, and Judicial Responses

  • Peter Coe*
  • , Rebecca Moosavian
  • , Paul Wragg
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

183 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) are abusive legal actions or threats brought by powerful parties to suppress criticism. This article is the first to interrogate the efficacy of the policy and legislative responses to SLAPPs in Europe and in England and Wales. It is also the first to provide extensive analysis of how SLAPPs have, to date, been treated by domestic courts, and how judges have applied the Civil Procedure Rules to the phenomenon. In assessing the existing early disposal mechanisms that have hitherto been deployed in these cases, and the early disposal mechanism prescribed in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 anti-SLAPP provisions, it argues that they are flawed, and in the case of ECCTA, a false dawn for tackling SLAPPs. Furthermore, and significantly, it advances an alternative model for a novel dedicated SLAPP early disposal mechanism.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages40
JournalJournal of Media Law
Early online date22 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Jan 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • SLAPPS
  • media law
  • defamation
  • freedom of expression
  • civil procedure
  • Europe
  • England and Wales

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs): a Critical Interrogation of Legislative, and Judicial Responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this