Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action

Rowland Miall, J Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report adaptation to delayed visual feedback during a manual tracking task, testing the nature of the adapted responses with frequency analysis. Two groups of seven subjects tracked unpredictable targets using a handheld joystick, alternating between pursuit and compensatory display trials. The test group then practised for 1 h per day with a visual feedback delay of 300 ms; the control group practice under normal undelayed conditions. Introduction of the visual feedback delay significantly disrupted tracking performance, with an increase in errors and a reduction in frequency of corrective movements. Subjects showed clear evidence of adaptation during the 5 day experiment, decreasing tracking error and decreasing the mean power of intermittent corrections. However, there was no evidence of a return towards the initial high frequency intermittent tracking. We suggest that the adaptation observed in this study reflects the modification of predictive feedforward actions, but that these data do not support control based on Smith Prediction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-84
Number of pages8
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this