Accounting for filter bandwidth improves the quantitative accuracy of bioluminescence tomography

Shelley L Taylor, Suzannah K G Mason, Sophie L Glinton, Mark Cobbold, Hamid Dehghani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
138 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Bioluminescence imaging is a noninvasive technique whereby surface weighted images of luminescent probes within animals are used to characterize cell count and function. Traditionally, data are collected over the entire emission spectrum of the source using no filters and are used to evaluate cell count/function over the entire spectrum. Alternatively, multispectral data over several wavelengths can be incorporated to perform tomographic reconstruction of source location and intensity. However, bandpass filters used for multispectral data acquisition have a specific bandwidth, which is ignored in the reconstruction. In this work, ignoring the bandwidth is shown to introduce a dependence of the recovered source intensity on the bandwidth of the filters. A method of accounting for the bandwidth of filters used during multispectral data acquisition is presented and its efficacy in increasing the quantitative accuracy of bioluminescence tomography is demonstrated through simulation and experiment. It is demonstrated that while using filters with a large bandwidth can dramatically decrease the data acquisition time, if not accounted for, errors of up to 200% in quantitative accuracy are introduced in two-dimensional planar imaging, even after normalization. For tomographic imaging, the use of this method to account for filter bandwidth dramatically improves the quantitative accuracy.
Original languageEnglish
Article number96001
JournalJournal of Biomedical Optics
Volume20
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015

Keywords

  • bioluminescence imaging
  • bioluminescence Tomography
  • image reconstruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for filter bandwidth improves the quantitative accuracy of bioluminescence tomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this