Access and engagement with maternity, social care and mental health services for perinatal migrant women with no recourse to public funds and irregular status: A cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR born in South London, UK, maternity-child data linkage

  • Hannah Rayment-Jones*
  • , Sam Burton
  • , Tisha Dasgupta
  • , Zenab Barry
  • , Kaat De Backer
  • , Natasha Baker
  • , Claire A. Wilson
  • , Kerrie Stevenson
  • , Zoë Vowles
  • , Kirsty Kitchen
  • , Abigail Easter
  • , Andrew Jolly
  • , Judith Rankin
  • , Cristina Fernandez-Turienzo
  • , Jane Sandall
  • , The eLIXIR Born in South London Partnership
  • , Lucilla Poston
  • , Laura A. Magee
  • , Robert Stewart
  • , David Edwards
  • Mark Ashworth, Jane Sandall, Ingrid Wolfe, Cheryl Gillett, Michael Absoud, Lucy Pickard, Amanda Grey, Sarah Spring, Toyin Kazeem, Amelia Jewell, Matthew Broadbent, Finola Higgins, Leonardo de Jongh, Tisha Dasgupta, Carolyn Gill
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives
In the UK, an estimated two million migrants are irregular or subject to No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) visa conditions, restricting welfare access and often requiring payment for NHS maternity care. The impact on maternity and perinatal service use remains poorly quantified.

Study design
Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Methods
We used linked electronic health records from maternity, neonatal, and mental health services in South London (eLIXIR-BiSL cohort). The sample included 56,690 women with 67,308 pregnancies (Oct 2018–Oct 2023). Migration status was categorised as UK-born, migrants with recourse to public funds, NRPF, or unknown visa status. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) were estimated using generalised linear models, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Results
Compared with UK-born women, migrants, particularly those with NRPF, had lower engagement with services. Women with NRPF were less likely to access early antenatal care (aRR 0.36 [0.33–0.38]), attend maternity triage (0.89 [0.82–0.96]), or birth in midwife-led settings (0.51 [0.36–0.71]). They were more likely to access care late (3.61 [3.33–3.92]), receive inadequate antenatal care (1.41 [1.30–1.53]), transfer providers (1.54 [1.36–1.74]), and experience prolonged postnatal stays (1.38 [1.21–1.57]). Women with NRPF had lower mental health care contact before (0.05 [0.03–0.08]) and during pregnancy (0.51 [0.37–0.69]), and reduced engagement with social care (0.36 [0.17–0.70]) and the criminal justice system (0.30 [0.19–0.44]).

Conclusions
Migrants with NRPF or unknown visa status face persistent barriers to maternity and mental health care. Inclusive reforms are needed to address inequity.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106175
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health
Volume252
Early online date3 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Access and engagement with maternity, social care and mental health services for perinatal migrant women with no recourse to public funds and irregular status: A cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR born in South London, UK, maternity-child data linkage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this