A rapid and systematic review of the effectiveness of temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma

J. Dinnes, C. Cave, S. Huang, R. Milne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    49 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A rapid and systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma was commissioned by the NHS HTA Programme on behalf of NICE. The full report has been published elsewhere. This paper summarizes the results for the effectiveness of temozolomide in people with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. The review was conducted using standard systematic review methodology involving a systematic literature search, quality assessment of included studies with systematic data extraction and data synthesis. One randomized controlled trial and four uncontrolled studies were identified for inclusion. The key results were that temozolomide may increase progression-free survival but has no significant impact on overall length of survival. The main effect from temozolomide may have been in those patients who had not received any prior chemotherapy regimens, however further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this suggestion. Temozolomide appears to produce few serious adverse effects and may also have a positive impact on health-related quality of life. Overall the evidence-base is weak and few strong conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of temozolomide. Large, well-designed randomized controlled trails conducted in a wider patient population are needed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)501-505
    Number of pages5
    JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
    Volume86
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A rapid and systematic review of the effectiveness of temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this