A NICE Fallacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A response is given to the claim by Claxton and Culyer, who stated that the policies of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) do not evaluate patients rather than treatments. The argument is made that the use of values such as quality of life and life-years is ethically dubious when used to choose which patients ought to receive treatments in the National Health Service (NHS).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-6
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Keywords

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Government Agencies
  • Health Care Costs
  • Health Care Rationing
  • Humans
  • National Health Programs
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • United Kingdom
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A NICE Fallacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this