A faster path between meaning and form? Iconicity facilitates sign recognition and production in British Sign Language

David Vinson*, Robin L. Thompson, Robert Skinner, Gabriella Vigliocco

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
509 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A standard view of language processing holds that lexical forms are arbitrary, and that non-arbitrary relationships between meaning and form such as onomatopoeias are unusual cases with little relevance to language processing in general. Here we capitalize on the greater availability of iconic lexical forms in a signed language (British Sign Language, BSL), to test how iconic relationships between meaning and form affect lexical processing. In three experiments, we found that iconicity in BSL facilitated picture-sign matching, phonological decision, and picture naming. In comprehension the effect of iconicity did not interact with other factors, but in production it was observed only for later-learned signs. These findings suggest that iconicity serves to activate conceptual features related to perception and action during lexical processing. We suggest that the same should be true for iconicity in spoken languages (e.g., onomatopoeias), and discuss the implications this has for general theories of lexical processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-85
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume82
Early online date30 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015

Keywords

  • Embodiment
  • Iconicity
  • Language comprehension
  • Language production
  • Lexicon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A faster path between meaning and form? Iconicity facilitates sign recognition and production in British Sign Language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this