A comparison of stimulus dosing methods for electroconvulsive therapy

J. Laidlaw*, P. Bentham, G. Khan, V. Staples, A. Dhariwal, B. Coope, E. Day, C. Fear, C. Marley, J. Stemman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims and methods: A prospective study comparing initial electroconvulsive therapy treatment doses determined by empirical dose titration with estimates derived from two simple dose prediction methods and a fixed-dose regimen (275 mC). Results: Thirty-three patients had seizure thresholds between 25 mC and 403 mC. The dose titration method led to a mean initial treatment dose of 195 mC that was intermediate between those predicted by the age method (275 mC) and the half-age method (137 mC). Estimates were within acceptable limits in 33% of cases for the age method, 64% for the half-age method and 40% for the fixed-dose method. Clinical implications: Either dose prediction or dose titration methods may be more appropriate in different clinical situations. The half-age method appears to be a more accurate predictor of optimum initial treatment dose.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)184-187
Number of pages4
JournalPsychiatric Bulletin
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of stimulus dosing methods for electroconvulsive therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this