A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics

George Kinnear*, Ian Jones, Chris Sangwin, Maryam Alarfaj, Ben Davies, Sam Fearn, Colin Foster, André Heck, Karen Henderson, Tim Hunt, Paola Iannone, Igor’ Kontorovich, Niclas Larson, Tim Lowe, John Meyer, Ann O’Shea, Peter Rowlett, Indunil Sikurajapathi, Thomas Wong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper describes the collaborative development of an agenda for research on e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. We built on an established approach to develop the agenda from the contributions of 22 mathematics education researchers, university teachers and learning technologists interested in this topic. The resulting set of 55 research questions are grouped into 5 broad themes: errors and feedback, student interactions with e-assessment, design and implementation choices, affordances offered by e-assessment tools, and mathematical skills. This agenda gives a framework for a programme of research aligned with practical concerns that will contribute to both theoretical and practical development.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages31
JournalInternational Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
Early online date12 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Delphi method
  • Feedback
  • Mathematics education
  • Online Learning
  • Delphi methods
  • Online learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • General Mathematics
  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this