Abstract
The recognised complexity of the innovation process not only makes it difficult to manage, explain and study, but also presents problems for the development of a generalised model. Cooper's recent article in ‘R&D Management’ suggests that the construction of a generalised model is inappropriate because there appear to be a number of different types of innovation processes. However, many of the studies of innovation postulate or assume a general model which represents the stages involved in the firm. This paper reviews the models of the innovation process which have been proposed and the author classifies them according to his taxonomy of different types: (a) Departmental‐stage models (b) Activity‐stage models (c) Decision‐stage models (d) Conversion process models (e) Response models The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed and the conclusion reached is that still more research needs to be concentrated on the nature of the innovation process within the firm itself. The absence of a definitive model compounds the problems of semantics and definitions when discussing innovation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-24 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | R&D Management |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 1984 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A classification and review of models of the intra‐firm innovation process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver